Vince Cachero
"The Anomaly"Career Averages
Loss Methods (2)
Fight History
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronnie Lawrence | 0 | 15 of 46 | 32% | 23 of 55 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0:36 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 77 of 121 | 63% | 102 of 151 | 8 of 9 | 88% | 0 | 0 | 7:49 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ronnie Lawrence | 0 | 10 of 24 | 41% | 11 of 26 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:09 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 17 of 34 | 50% | 18 of 37 | 2 of 3 | 66% | 0 | 0 | 2:08 | |
| 2 | Ronnie Lawrence | 0 | 5 of 20 | 25% | 10 of 25 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0:27 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 10 of 19 | 52% | 12 of 24 | 5 of 5 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 3:14 | |
| 3 | Ronnie Lawrence | 0 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 2 of 4 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:00 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 50 of 68 | 73% | 72 of 90 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 2:27 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronnie Lawrence | 15 of 46 | 32% | 8 of 36 | 3 of 6 | 4 of 4 | 10 of 38 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 1 |
| Vince Cachero | 77 of 121 | 63% | 53 of 89 | 14 of 19 | 10 of 13 | 22 of 46 | 5 of 7 | 50 of 68 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ronnie Lawrence | 10 of 24 | 41% | 6 of 18 | 1 of 3 | 3 of 3 | 5 of 17 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 0 |
| Vince Cachero | 17 of 34 | 50% | 5 of 17 | 7 of 9 | 5 of 8 | 10 of 24 | 5 of 7 | 2 of 3 | |
| 2 | Ronnie Lawrence | 5 of 20 | 25% | 2 of 16 | 2 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 5 of 19 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 1 |
| Vince Cachero | 10 of 19 | 52% | 1 of 8 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 4 | 10 of 19 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | |
| 3 | Ronnie Lawrence | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
| Vince Cachero | 50 of 68 | 73% | 47 of 64 | 2 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 48 of 65 |
Expert Picks (4)
Big Brady picks Ronnie Lawrence to win by decision, but he is not confident. He notes Lawrence has a wrestling advantage and can get takedowns, while Cachero has poor takedown defense. However, he thinks the line at -160 is too wide and sees this as a close fight. He says he would not bet on it and considers it a low-level fight.
Daniel Levi picks Ronnie Lawrence, citing his wrestling and takedown ability, which exploits Cachero's weakness in takedown defense. He notes Cachero has been taken down and finished by higher-level opponents. Levi believes Lawrence's mix of strikes and takedowns will overwhelm Cachero, leading to a decision win.
Lawrence mixes strikes and takedowns well, keeping opponents guessing. Cachero has weak takedown defense and Lawrence should be able to secure takedowns and control the fight. Lawrence's movement and kicking game will keep Cachero at range. Expect a decision win for Lawrence.
The MMA Guru picks Ronnie Lawrence, citing his strong wrestling and ability to take down Cachero at will, as seen in Cachero's previous fight where Jamal Emmers easily secured takedowns. He notes Lawrence's short-notice Contender Series win showed great cardio, and with a full camp he expects even better performance. He is not tempted by Cachero's underdog odds, believing Lawrence's wrestling gives him a clear path to victory via unanimous decision.
Aug 01, 2020
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamall Emmers | 0 | 103 of 196 | 52% | 113 of 209 | 5 of 7 | 71% | 0 | 0 | 5:47 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 76 of 152 | 50% | 121 of 201 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:28 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jamall Emmers | 0 | 49 of 85 | 57% | 49 of 85 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0:49 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 28 of 59 | 47% | 37 of 69 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:15 | |
| 2 | Jamall Emmers | 0 | 43 of 88 | 48% | 50 of 97 | 2 of 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 1:27 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 39 of 75 | 52% | 53 of 91 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:01 | |
| 3 | Jamall Emmers | 0 | 11 of 23 | 47% | 14 of 27 | 2 of 4 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 3:31 |
| Vince Cachero | 0 | 9 of 18 | 50% | 31 of 41 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:12 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamall Emmers | 103 of 196 | 52% | 58 of 143 | 37 of 44 | 8 of 9 | 78 of 164 | 23 of 30 | 2 of 2 |
| Vince Cachero | 76 of 152 | 50% | 58 of 127 | 10 of 15 | 8 of 10 | 62 of 132 | 11 of 17 | 3 of 3 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jamall Emmers | 49 of 85 | 57% | 16 of 46 | 28 of 33 | 5 of 6 | 29 of 63 | 20 of 22 | 0 of 0 |
| Vince Cachero | 28 of 59 | 47% | 18 of 44 | 5 of 9 | 5 of 6 | 22 of 49 | 5 of 9 | 1 of 1 | |
| 2 | Jamall Emmers | 43 of 88 | 48% | 36 of 79 | 5 of 7 | 2 of 2 | 40 of 82 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 1 |
| Vince Cachero | 39 of 75 | 52% | 33 of 69 | 3 of 3 | 3 of 3 | 36 of 70 | 2 of 4 | 1 of 1 | |
| 3 | Jamall Emmers | 11 of 23 | 47% | 6 of 18 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 1 | 9 of 19 | 1 of 3 | 1 of 1 |
| Vince Cachero | 9 of 18 | 50% | 7 of 14 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 4 of 13 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 1 |
Expert Picks (4)
Big Brady picks Jamall Emmers to win by decision as an underdog. He notes Emmers has a significant height and reach advantage and is a standout wrestler. He believes Emmers will lose the first round but take over in the second and third, similar to his fight against Giga Chikadze. He thinks the line should be closer to a pick'em and considers betting on Emmers at +155.
Daniel picks Emmers, acknowledging his talent and athleticism but criticizing his fight IQ. He notes that Cachero is coming in on short notice and moving up a weight class. He expects Emmers to get his first UFC win.
The host picks Emmers but with low confidence due to Emmers' questionable fight IQ, as he often chooses to strike instead of using his wrestling. He notes that Emmers has a size and strength advantage and should win if he wrestles, but he cannot trust him to do so. He also mentions that Valiev has takedown defense issues but is a solid fighter. He passes on betting due to uncertainty.
The host picks Timo Valiev (Vince Cachero's opponent) to win by TKO or submission in the second or third round. He notes Valiev's gritty grappling and ability to take down taller opponents, and believes he will outwork Jamall Emmers despite Emmers' length advantage. He acknowledges Emmers is tough but favors Valiev's wrestling and cardio.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!