Career Averages - Daniel Pineda
Career Averages - Herbert Burns
Daniel Pineda - Fight History
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Elkins | 0 | 39 of 88 | 44% | 102 of 170 | 3 of 12 | 25% | 0 | 1 | 6:33 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 31 of 53 | 58% | 61 of 85 | 0 of 0 | --- | 2 | 1 | 3:02 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darren Elkins | 0 | 3 of 8 | 37% | 23 of 35 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 1 | 2:07 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 13 of 15 | 86% | 27 of 30 | 0 of 0 | --- | 2 | 1 | 2:07 | |
| 2 | Darren Elkins | 0 | 19 of 47 | 40% | 39 of 72 | 2 of 4 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 2:24 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 12 of 24 | 50% | 17 of 29 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:05 | |
| 3 | Darren Elkins | 0 | 17 of 33 | 51% | 40 of 63 | 0 of 6 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 2:02 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 6 of 14 | 42% | 17 of 26 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:50 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Elkins | 39 of 88 | 44% | 30 of 78 | 9 of 10 | 0 of 0 | 28 of 70 | 3 of 7 | 8 of 11 |
| Daniel Pineda | 31 of 53 | 58% | 21 of 38 | 7 of 10 | 3 of 5 | 17 of 37 | 1 of 1 | 13 of 15 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darren Elkins | 3 of 8 | 37% | 3 of 8 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 2 of 6 | 0 of 1 | 1 of 1 |
| Daniel Pineda | 13 of 15 | 86% | 12 of 13 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 12 of 13 | |
| 2 | Darren Elkins | 19 of 47 | 40% | 15 of 42 | 4 of 5 | 0 of 0 | 12 of 37 | 0 of 0 | 7 of 10 |
| Daniel Pineda | 12 of 24 | 50% | 6 of 15 | 5 of 6 | 1 of 3 | 10 of 22 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | |
| 3 | Darren Elkins | 17 of 33 | 51% | 12 of 28 | 5 of 5 | 0 of 0 | 14 of 27 | 3 of 6 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 6 of 14 | 42% | 3 of 10 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 2 | 6 of 13 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 1 |
Angelo is surprised Darren Elkins is the underdog and has a bet on him at +102. He notes Elkins' incredible toughness, grinding style, and ability to fight a full 15 minutes without fading, while Pineda is a feast-or-famine fighter who fades quickly after an initial burst. He thinks Elkins can weather the early storm and take over as the fight goes on. He sees value in the underdog line and expects Elkins to win.
Big Brady picks Darren Elkins by third-round knockout. He sees it as Pineda early, Elkins late. Pineda is dangerous early with power and grappling, but gasses badly. Elkins is extremely tough and will not let Pineda off the hook if he fades. He expects Elkins to take over, take Pineda down, and finish him in the third round.
Connor also picks Elkins hesitantly, noting that Pineda is violent but inconsistent, with a tendency to gas and lose focus. He compares the matchup to the 'Darren Elkins vs Michael Johnson award' for one-true-outcome fights. He acknowledges that Elkins could get knocked out early, but Pineda's self-destructive tendencies make Elkins the safer pick.
This fight was not discussed in the transcript.
Pineda has finished all 28 of his victories but will struggle with the relentless style of Elkins. As long as Elkins' durability holds up early, he should be able to break Pineda down and find a finish in the second or third round.
The Guru believes Darren Elkins has taken too much damage and no longer has it at age 40. He notes Pineda had good performances against Nathaniel Wood and Alex Caceres, and expects Pineda to destroy Elkins' lead leg with calf kicks and get a guillotine off a lazy takedown. He predicts a TKO or submission finish.
Zane picks Elkins but with hesitation, acknowledging that Elkins is 40 and could get knocked out. However, he notes that Pineda is the type of fighter who beats himself—he gasses, loses focus, and makes bad decisions. Elkins historically beats those kinds of fighters by accepting the gift. Zane says he can't feel good about it but can't pick Pineda either.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathaniel Wood | 1 | 66 of 93 | 70% | 81 of 110 | 0 of 0 | --- | 1 | 1 | 3:42 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 32 of 69 | 46% | 80 of 125 | 1 of 6 | 16% | 0 | 2 | 5:32 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nathaniel Wood | 0 | 15 of 21 | 71% | 24 of 31 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 2:09 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 13 of 18 | 72% | 30 of 37 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 1 | 1:47 | |
| 2 | Nathaniel Wood | 1 | 42 of 61 | 68% | 47 of 67 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 1:22 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 12 of 36 | 33% | 24 of 49 | 0 of 3 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:04 | |
| 3 | Nathaniel Wood | 0 | 9 of 11 | 81% | 10 of 12 | 0 of 0 | --- | 1 | 1 | 0:11 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 7 of 15 | 46% | 26 of 39 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 1 | 3:41 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathaniel Wood | 66 of 93 | 70% | 35 of 56 | 12 of 14 | 19 of 23 | 55 of 79 | 0 of 0 | 11 of 14 |
| Daniel Pineda | 32 of 69 | 46% | 21 of 53 | 3 of 5 | 8 of 11 | 19 of 53 | 2 of 2 | 11 of 14 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nathaniel Wood | 15 of 21 | 71% | 8 of 14 | 3 of 3 | 4 of 4 | 11 of 16 | 0 of 0 | 4 of 5 |
| Daniel Pineda | 13 of 18 | 72% | 10 of 14 | 0 of 1 | 3 of 3 | 4 of 8 | 0 of 0 | 9 of 10 | |
| 2 | Nathaniel Wood | 42 of 61 | 68% | 22 of 37 | 8 of 9 | 12 of 15 | 35 of 52 | 0 of 0 | 7 of 9 |
| Daniel Pineda | 12 of 36 | 33% | 5 of 26 | 2 of 3 | 5 of 7 | 11 of 35 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | |
| 3 | Nathaniel Wood | 9 of 11 | 81% | 5 of 5 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 4 | 9 of 11 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 7 of 15 | 46% | 6 of 13 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 1 | 4 of 10 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 4 |
Angelo picks Nathaniel Wood as the biggest favorite on the card, citing Wood's superior striking, grappling, and durability. He notes that Daniel Pineda is dangerous early but fades quickly, and Wood only needs to survive the first few minutes. Angelo believes Wood is better everywhere and is safe to parlay.
Cody picks Nathaniel Wood, citing his technical striking, cardio, and improving wrestling. He notes that Daniel Pineda is a dangerous first-round fighter but fades quickly, and that Wood can survive the early onslaught and take over in later rounds. Cody believes Wood can win by decision or late finish, and suggests waiting for a better live price after the first round.
Daniel thinks Nathaniel Wood is better everywhere but has a questionable chin. He notes Daniel Pineda is a kill-or-be-killed fighter with all wins by finish, but 0-6 in decisions. He expects Wood to weather an early storm and win a decision if he survives.
Paul agrees with Cody, expecting Wood to win. He notes that Pineda's best chance is early, and he might sprinkle on Pineda by submission in round one at long odds. However, he believes Wood's volume and cardio will be too much as the fight goes on.
The MMA Guru picks Nathaniel Wood, calling Daniel Pineda 'trash' and a former PED user. He believes Wood is levels above Pineda in skill, especially on the feet, and will win the low kick battle, which is key to Pineda's game. Wood's recent grappling win over Alex Caceres shows his well-roundedness. The Guru sympathizes with Wood's bad luck in past fights and expects him to win decisively.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Caceres | 0 | 60 of 99 | 60% | 86 of 128 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 1 | 4:26 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 27 of 56 | 48% | 43 of 74 | 3 of 11 | 27% | 1 | 1 | 3:57 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alex Caceres | 0 | 15 of 30 | 50% | 29 of 46 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 3:02 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 5 of 7 | 71% | 11 of 13 | 1 of 6 | 16% | 1 | 0 | 0:16 | |
| 2 | Alex Caceres | 0 | 5 of 9 | 55% | 7 of 12 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 1 | 0:43 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 9 of 14 | 64% | 19 of 26 | 2 of 3 | 66% | 0 | 1 | 3:36 | |
| 3 | Alex Caceres | 0 | 40 of 60 | 66% | 50 of 70 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0:41 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 13 of 35 | 37% | 13 of 35 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:05 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Caceres | 60 of 99 | 60% | 32 of 69 | 26 of 28 | 2 of 2 | 45 of 76 | 11 of 15 | 4 of 8 |
| Daniel Pineda | 27 of 56 | 48% | 15 of 42 | 3 of 4 | 9 of 10 | 22 of 50 | 2 of 3 | 3 of 3 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alex Caceres | 15 of 30 | 50% | 9 of 24 | 5 of 5 | 1 of 1 | 6 of 15 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 8 |
| Daniel Pineda | 5 of 7 | 71% | 1 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 4 of 4 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Alex Caceres | 5 of 9 | 55% | 2 of 6 | 3 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 5 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 9 of 14 | 64% | 8 of 12 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 1 | 4 of 8 | 2 of 3 | 3 of 3 | |
| 3 | Alex Caceres | 40 of 60 | 66% | 21 of 39 | 18 of 20 | 1 of 1 | 36 of 56 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 13 of 35 | 37% | 6 of 27 | 2 of 3 | 5 of 5 | 13 of 35 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo picks Caceres, believing he can weather Pineda's early storm and then take over as Pineda fades. He notes Pineda is dangerous but only for about three minutes. Angelo is concerned about recency bias from Caceres' knockout win over Julian Erosa, but still thinks Caceres' durability and experience will carry him.
Cody picks Caceres, noting his resurgence and improved skills across the board. He mentions Caceres has a knack for taking the back and fishing for rear-naked chokes. Cody contrasts Pineda's early-finish style with Caceres's ability to go the distance. He also notes Caceres recently lost a grappling match to Pat Sabatini, which could be a concern. Overall, he feels Caceres should win over 15 minutes but isn't overly confident.
Connor picks Pineda, citing that Caceres has historically struggled against intense, fast-starting power punchers. He notes that Pineda's aggression and power could overwhelm Caceres early, as seen in Caceres' losses to Francisco Rivera and Juan Wong. However, Connor is hesitant because Pineda is inconsistent and can be outmaneuvered by mobile strikers.
Daniel sees this as a dog-or-pass situation, noting that Pineda is a kill-or-be-killed fighter with 30 finishes in 30 wins. He believes the line has overcorrected after Caceres' win over Julian Erosa, and that Pineda's grappling and finishing ability make him a live underdog. However, he acknowledges Pineda's cardio issues and the risk of him getting finished himself.
Jacob picks Pineda, citing his power and finishing ability. He thinks Pineda's leg kicks will slow Caceres' movement and set up takedowns or knockout shots. Jacob notes Caceres' recent knockout was against a broken Julian Erosa and he hasn't shown real power since 2010. He believes Pineda finds a finish.
Caceres has cleaner technical striking and a sneaky submission game. Pineda is aggressive but leaves openings. Caceres will likely land a head kick or set up a submission in the second or third round. The fight not going to decision is a strong prop.
Paul picks Alex Caceres but is not confident at the -180 price. He notes Caceres has improved his wrestling and striking, and his grappling is his best asset. Paul points out Pineda is a front-runner who fades in later rounds, while Caceres can survive and be dangerous in the second and third. However, he acknowledges Pineda's physical strength and BJJ could pose problems if he gets takedowns early. Paul leans Caceres over 15 minutes but won't bet heavily.
The MMA Guru picks Alex Caceres, noting he is very hard to finish due to his elusiveness. He highlights Caceres' five-fight win streak with finishes, and a close fight with Sadiq Youssef. He believes Caceres will make it tricky for Pineda on the feet and that Pineda will slow down due to rough weight cuts. He thinks if it goes to decision, Caceres wins, though Pineda is a finisher.
Zane picks Caceres because he believes Pineda's striking falls apart against fighters who use movement and angles. He notes that Pineda overthrows and is vulnerable to fluid strikers like Caceres. Zane expects Caceres to survive Pineda's early intensity and then take over, similar to how Andre Fili beat Pineda.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 1 | 24 of 45 | 53% | 41 of 66 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 2 | 0 | 2:20 |
| Tucker Lutz | 0 | 28 of 78 | 35% | 33 of 84 | 0 of 4 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 1:27 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 1 | 17 of 32 | 53% | 28 of 45 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0:50 |
| Tucker Lutz | 0 | 24 of 65 | 36% | 29 of 71 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:44 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 0 | 7 of 13 | 53% | 13 of 21 | 0 of 0 | --- | 2 | 0 | 1:30 |
| Tucker Lutz | 0 | 4 of 13 | 30% | 4 of 13 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:43 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 24 of 45 | 53% | 10 of 24 | 4 of 10 | 10 of 11 | 22 of 41 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 0 |
| Tucker Lutz | 28 of 78 | 35% | 17 of 61 | 8 of 11 | 3 of 6 | 22 of 71 | 6 of 7 | 0 of 0 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 17 of 32 | 53% | 4 of 14 | 4 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 16 of 30 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
| Tucker Lutz | 24 of 65 | 36% | 15 of 50 | 7 of 10 | 2 of 5 | 18 of 58 | 6 of 7 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 7 of 13 | 53% | 6 of 10 | 0 of 1 | 1 of 2 | 6 of 11 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
| Tucker Lutz | 4 of 13 | 30% | 2 of 11 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 4 of 13 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo picks Lutz, expecting him to weather Pineda's early storm and then take over with wrestling. He notes that Pineda is feast-or-famine with a 100% finish rate but fades quickly. He thinks Lutz is powerful and should get takedowns and a finish. He recommends betting 'fight doesn't go the distance' rather than a moneyline.
Big Brady picks Tucker Lutz by third-round TKO, viewing it as a fade on Daniel Pineda. He notes Pineda's age (37), history of PED use, and tendency to gas out after the first round. Brady believes Lutz's grinding style and pace will wear down Pineda, who has never won a 15-minute fight. He expects Lutz to survive the early danger and finish Pineda late.
Cody picks Lutz confidently, calling Pineda a one-round fighter with poor cardio and a history of fading. He notes Pineda is 37, off a two-year layoff, and was previously caught for steroids. He believes Lutz's takedown defense and volume striking will neutralize Pineda's early grappling threat, and that Lutz will break Pineda down over three rounds.
Connor leans toward Tucker Lutz but expresses hesitation, noting that Lutz hasn't faced a fighter as violent and unpredictable as Daniel Pineda. He points out that Pineda has crushed young prospects before and that Lutz's recent UFC wins have been decisions against less dangerous opponents. Connor is curious to see how Lutz handles Pineda's calf kicks and chaotic pressure, and he wouldn't be super confident in Lutz passing this test just yet.
Jacob picks Lutz but is not confident, echoing that Lutz should win but the fight is not worth betting. He notes that Pineda is tough and wild, and that Lutz was out-grappled by Sabatini, but that is not a concern. He says the breakdowns are repetitive because many favorites on this card are similar.
The host leans with the younger, faster, more explosive Tucker Lutz, expecting him to come back with vengeance after his first UFC loss. He thinks Lutz's combination striking, speed, and explosiveness will find Pineda's chin and put him away via ground and pound. He also likes the prop 'fight doesn't go to decision' as Pineda's fights almost always finish inside the distance.
The Guru picks Lutz, noting Pineda's gas tank issues and tendency to fade after the first round. He believes Lutz's durability and cardio will allow him to win the last two rounds via decision, despite a tough first round.
Zane picks Tucker Lutz because he sees Lutz as a solid, reliable fighter who is difficult to finish and has a safe, counter-punching style that should outlast Daniel Pineda's wild aggression. He notes that Pineda is prone to self-destructing and fading as the fight goes on, while Lutz has the durability and technical boxing to stay out of harm's way and accumulate points. Zane also mentions that Lutz's style is similar to Cody Stamann's, which has proven effective against aggressive but less technical opponents.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Fili | 0 | 34 of 67 | 50% | 44 of 78 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0:45 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 15 of 34 | 44% | 43 of 62 | 0 of 7 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 1:38 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andre Fili | 0 | 29 of 57 | 50% | 39 of 68 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0:45 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 10 of 24 | 41% | 38 of 52 | 0 of 6 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 1:38 | |
| 2 | Andre Fili | 0 | 5 of 10 | 50% | 5 of 10 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:00 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 5 of 10 | 50% | 5 of 10 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:00 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Fili | 34 of 67 | 50% | 29 of 61 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 2 | 28 of 59 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 6 |
| Daniel Pineda | 15 of 34 | 44% | 7 of 25 | 3 of 4 | 5 of 5 | 15 of 34 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andre Fili | 29 of 57 | 50% | 26 of 53 | 2 of 2 | 1 of 2 | 23 of 49 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 6 |
| Daniel Pineda | 10 of 24 | 41% | 4 of 17 | 2 of 3 | 4 of 4 | 10 of 24 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Andre Fili | 5 of 10 | 50% | 3 of 8 | 2 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 5 of 10 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 5 of 10 | 50% | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 5 of 10 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo picks Andre Fili, noting he is more technical and will avoid Pineda's haymakers, survive the first round, and pull out a win. He does not love the -225 odds or 8900 price tag but believes Fili wins. He has a bet on under 2.5 rounds because Pineda is feast or famine.
Big Brady picks Andre Fili to win by KO, noting Pineda's 100% finish rate but also his age (35) and recent poor performance against Cub Swanson. He thinks Pineda is very dangerous in the first round but will gas out, and Fili can weather the storm and finish him later. He compares it to the Rosa/Jaynes fight. He would not bet it due to Pineda's danger.
Cody picks Andre Fili but expects a sweat. He notes Pineda has never won a decision in 50 pro fights, meaning he must finish Fili. Fili is extremely durable, having been dropped but never finished cleanly. Cody thinks Fili's cardio and toughness will allow him to outlast Pineda, who tends to fade after the first round. He suggests live betting Pineda early and then Fili later.
Jacob picks Andre Fili, praising his toughness and competition level. He notes Fili has lost only to top fighters and has survived against tough opponents. Jacob believes Fili will dominate and is great value at 8900. He likes more/more on the monkey knife fight line.
Fili has one of the best jabs in the UFC and should use it to keep Pineda at distance. He needs to stay disciplined and on the outside to avoid Pineda's forward pressure. Fili's height and reach advantage will be key. If he lets Pineda inside or get taken down, it could be a rough night. Fili should outpoint Pineda on the feet and win a decision.
Paul picks Fili but is not excited about the -225 price. He notes Fili's durability and solid grappling, and that Pineda comes out fast but fades. He thinks Fili can survive the early storm and take over. He considered Fili by decision but the +150 odds didn't excite him.
The MMA Guru picks Andre Fili by late second-round TKO, citing his size, reach, and range advantage over Pineda. He believes Fili's defense will neutralize Pineda's leg kicks and that Pineda's cardio will fade due to a tough weight cut. He expects Fili to box Pineda up and finish him against the cage in the second round.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cub Swanson | 2 | 46 of 66 | 69% | 51 of 71 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 1:34 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 21 of 45 | 46% | 40 of 65 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 1 | 0 | 0:35 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cub Swanson | 1 | 31 of 47 | 65% | 34 of 50 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 1:31 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 16 of 30 | 53% | 35 of 50 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 0:08 | |
| 2 | Cub Swanson | 1 | 15 of 19 | 78% | 17 of 21 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:03 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 5 of 15 | 33% | 5 of 15 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:27 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cub Swanson | 46 of 66 | 69% | 35 of 51 | 7 of 11 | 4 of 4 | 37 of 54 | 3 of 3 | 6 of 9 |
| Daniel Pineda | 21 of 45 | 46% | 9 of 28 | 3 of 4 | 9 of 13 | 19 of 43 | 2 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cub Swanson | 31 of 47 | 65% | 23 of 36 | 4 of 7 | 4 of 4 | 23 of 36 | 3 of 3 | 5 of 8 |
| Daniel Pineda | 16 of 30 | 53% | 6 of 17 | 2 of 3 | 8 of 10 | 14 of 28 | 2 of 2 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Cub Swanson | 15 of 19 | 78% | 12 of 15 | 3 of 4 | 0 of 0 | 14 of 18 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 1 |
| Daniel Pineda | 5 of 15 | 33% | 3 of 11 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 3 | 5 of 15 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Big Brady picks Daniel Pineda to win by first-round submission. He highlights Pineda's 100% finish rate (27 wins all finishes) and Swanson's history of being submitted six times. He likes Pineda's recent form and believes he is in his prime, while Swanson is past his prime and coming off injury. He recommends betting Pineda inside the distance at +140.
Daniel is impressed with Pineda's resurgence, noting his 29 finishes and recent dominant performances. He questions Cub Swanson's level of competition and thinks Swanson is on his way out. He predicts Pineda will catch Cub with a submission, possibly his 20th submission win.
Pineda's wrestling and top pressure will be a nightmare for Swanson, who has struggled with grapplers. Pineda should be able to take Swanson down repeatedly and finish him via ground and pound or submission. Swanson's recent losses have come via submission, and Pineda's style matches up well. The under 2.5 rounds is a good prop.
The MMA Guru picks Cub Swanson, despite the long layoff due to injury. He believes Swanson's experience against good jiu-jitsu guys and his stand-up will be the difference. He expects Swanson to keep the fight standing and win a unanimous decision. He dismisses Daniel Pineda's wins as unimpressive and notes Pineda's past PED issues.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 10 of 22 | 45% | 35 of 48 | 3 of 4 | 75% | 0 | 0 | 2:39 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 57 of 75 | 76% | 173 of 205 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 1 | 6:13 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 0 | 4 of 13 | 30% | 21 of 31 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0:12 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 24 of 40 | 60% | 87 of 111 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 4:18 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 0 | 6 of 9 | 66% | 14 of 17 | 2 of 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 2:27 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 33 of 35 | 94% | 86 of 94 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 1 | 1:55 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 10 of 22 | 45% | 6 of 15 | 2 of 5 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 15 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Herbert Burns | 57 of 75 | 76% | 50 of 65 | 4 of 7 | 3 of 3 | 8 of 13 | 1 of 1 | 48 of 61 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 4 of 13 | 30% | 1 of 7 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 2 | 1 of 1 |
| Herbert Burns | 24 of 40 | 60% | 19 of 32 | 3 of 6 | 2 of 2 | 6 of 10 | 1 of 1 | 17 of 29 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 6 of 9 | 66% | 5 of 8 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 5 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 4 |
| Herbert Burns | 33 of 35 | 94% | 31 of 33 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 31 of 32 |
Big Brady is impressed with Herbert Burns' improvements and superior grappling. He expects Burns to submit Pineda in the first round, noting Pineda has been submitted five times. He thinks the fight won't go to decision.
Daniel Levi picks Herbert Burns to win by first-round submission. He notes that Pineda has never been to a decision (0-6 in decisions) and has been submitted six times. He believes Pineda's scrambling style is a bad matchup against Burns' elite jiu-jitsu. He also points out that Pineda's recent wins were overturned due to PEDs, and he may be deflated under USADA testing. He cites Burns' performance against Dunham as evidence of his submission prowess.
Pineda is a live dog with strong wrestling and top pressure; he has not been submitted since 2010 and has the experience to survive Burns' early submission threats. Burns' recent finishes are against over-the-hill competition, while Pineda is still in his prime. The line is too wide; Pineda should be closer to +120. He will play it safe, rack up rounds, and win a decision.
The MMA Guru picks Herbert Burns by submission in the first round, calling it the surest win on the card. He highlights Burns' knockout of Nate Landwehr with a knee up the middle as evidence of his finishing ability, and dismisses Pineda as a past-prime cheater.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Whiteford | 0 | 24 of 44 | 54% | 40 of 60 | 1 of 5 | 20% | 3 | 0 | 1:10 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 26 of 50 | 52% | 54 of 84 | 5 of 14 | 35% | 0 | 0 | 7:43 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Whiteford | 0 | 8 of 18 | 44% | 13 of 23 | 0 of 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:01 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 15 of 29 | 51% | 26 of 42 | 2 of 6 | 33% | 0 | 0 | 2:02 | |
| 2 | Robert Whiteford | 0 | 6 of 11 | 54% | 11 of 16 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 1 | 0 | 0:21 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 9 of 17 | 52% | 20 of 30 | 1 of 3 | 33% | 0 | 0 | 2:39 | |
| 3 | Robert Whiteford | 0 | 10 of 15 | 66% | 16 of 21 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 0:48 |
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 2 of 4 | 50% | 8 of 12 | 2 of 5 | 40% | 0 | 0 | 3:02 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Whiteford | 24 of 44 | 54% | 7 of 25 | 8 of 10 | 9 of 9 | 14 of 31 | 1 of 3 | 9 of 10 |
| Daniel Pineda | 26 of 50 | 52% | 14 of 34 | 9 of 12 | 3 of 4 | 17 of 34 | 6 of 11 | 3 of 5 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Whiteford | 8 of 18 | 44% | 2 of 11 | 5 of 6 | 1 of 1 | 7 of 16 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 15 of 29 | 51% | 6 of 16 | 7 of 10 | 2 of 3 | 9 of 19 | 5 of 9 | 1 of 1 | |
| 2 | Robert Whiteford | 6 of 11 | 54% | 3 of 8 | 2 of 2 | 1 of 1 | 6 of 10 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
| Daniel Pineda | 9 of 17 | 52% | 7 of 15 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 6 of 11 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 4 | |
| 3 | Robert Whiteford | 10 of 15 | 66% | 2 of 6 | 1 of 2 | 7 of 7 | 1 of 5 | 0 of 0 | 9 of 10 |
| Daniel Pineda | 2 of 4 | 50% | 1 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Herbert Burns - Fight History
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Jenkins | 2 | 73 of 126 | 57% | 98 of 152 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 2:44 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 24 of 79 | 30% | 45 of 101 | 2 of 9 | 22% | 0 | 0 | 1:54 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jack Jenkins | 0 | 39 of 66 | 59% | 53 of 80 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:03 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 15 of 53 | 28% | 28 of 66 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1:09 | |
| 2 | Jack Jenkins | 1 | 20 of 38 | 52% | 31 of 50 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 2:15 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 6 of 23 | 26% | 14 of 32 | 1 of 6 | 16% | 0 | 0 | 0:45 | |
| 3 | Jack Jenkins | 1 | 14 of 22 | 63% | 14 of 22 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:26 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 3 of 3 | 100% | 3 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:00 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Jenkins | 73 of 126 | 57% | 44 of 95 | 15 of 15 | 14 of 16 | 59 of 99 | 0 of 1 | 14 of 26 |
| Herbert Burns | 24 of 79 | 30% | 11 of 61 | 7 of 10 | 6 of 8 | 21 of 73 | 3 of 4 | 0 of 2 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jack Jenkins | 39 of 66 | 59% | 24 of 51 | 11 of 11 | 4 of 4 | 39 of 65 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
| Herbert Burns | 15 of 53 | 28% | 8 of 43 | 4 of 6 | 3 of 4 | 14 of 51 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Jack Jenkins | 20 of 38 | 52% | 8 of 24 | 3 of 3 | 9 of 11 | 14 of 26 | 0 of 0 | 6 of 12 |
| Herbert Burns | 6 of 23 | 26% | 2 of 17 | 2 of 3 | 2 of 3 | 5 of 20 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 2 | |
| 3 | Jack Jenkins | 14 of 22 | 63% | 12 of 20 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 6 of 8 | 0 of 0 | 8 of 14 |
| Herbert Burns | 3 of 3 | 100% | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 2 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo is confident Jack Jenkins will win, citing his superior striking, takedown defense, and multiple ways to win. He dismisses Herbert Burns as a submission-or-bust fighter with poor offensive wrestling who seems to hate fighting. Angelo expects Jenkins to light Burns up on the feet and suggests parlaying him before the odds get even shorter.
Big Brady picks Jack Jenkins to win by second-round knockout. He notes Herbert Burns is very dangerous in the first five minutes but has poor cardio, heart, and durability, and has been knocked out in the second round in his last three losses. He believes Jenkins can survive the first round, possibly in bad spots, and then finish Burns in the second. He cautions that Jenkins has been finished in all three of his losses, so Burns has a five-minute window to submit him, but overall he expects Jenkins to get the knockout.
Cody is confident Jenkins will win but notes the price is blown out. He expects Jenkins to survive the first round and then take over as Burns gasses. He mentions Jenkins' leg kicks and cardio as advantages, but warns that Burns has a puncher's chance early. Cody suggests live betting Jenkins after the first round.
Daniel Vreeland picks Jack Jenkins to win by late finish, likely in round two or three. He notes that Jenkins is a systematic leg kicker who will chop Burns down, while Burns gasses and has been finished repeatedly. Vreeland suggests playing Jenkins round two as a hedge against the under 1.5 rounds.
The host picks Jenkins, noting his solid striking and mixing of martial arts. He expects Jenkins to avoid Burns' early power and then put a pace on him, finishing him likely by knockout. He mentions the under 1.5 rounds prop as a potential bet, and notes Jenkins' round 2 prop at +550.
Paul acknowledges Jenkins is not a potent finisher but believes he will outlast Burns, who has terrible cardio. He notes that Burns has been submitted in his last two and that Jenkins has never been knocked out. Paul calls it a cop-out but picks Jenkins, though he is priced out of betting.
The MMA Guru picks Jack Jenkins over Herbert Burns. He criticizes Burns as a quitter with only one round of cardio, comparing him to Makwan Amirkhani. He praises Jenkins' takedown defense, noting his strong hips and foot positioning. He predicts Burns will have early moments but gas out and get finished in the second or third round, possibly by TKO. He also mentions body kicks on the ground as a potential finish.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julio Arce | 2 | 29 of 79 | 36% | 29 of 79 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:08 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 15 of 57 | 26% | 20 of 63 | 0 of 6 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 1:16 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Julio Arce | 0 | 10 of 38 | 26% | 10 of 38 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:06 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 11 of 37 | 29% | 16 of 43 | 0 of 5 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:50 | |
| 2 | Julio Arce | 2 | 19 of 41 | 46% | 19 of 41 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:02 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 4 of 20 | 20% | 4 of 20 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:26 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julio Arce | 29 of 79 | 36% | 19 of 65 | 9 of 12 | 1 of 2 | 20 of 68 | 9 of 11 | 0 of 0 |
| Herbert Burns | 15 of 57 | 26% | 9 of 45 | 5 of 10 | 1 of 2 | 13 of 55 | 2 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Julio Arce | 10 of 38 | 26% | 5 of 31 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 0 | 9 of 37 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
| Herbert Burns | 11 of 37 | 29% | 7 of 29 | 3 of 6 | 1 of 2 | 10 of 36 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | |
| 2 | Julio Arce | 19 of 41 | 46% | 14 of 34 | 4 of 5 | 1 of 2 | 11 of 31 | 8 of 10 | 0 of 0 |
| Herbert Burns | 4 of 20 | 20% | 2 of 16 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 19 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo is confident Julio Arce will win, citing his solid striking, volume, and 94% takedown defense. He criticizes Herbert Burns for quitting in his last fight and doubts Burns can get takedowns. However, he avoids betting due to Arce's long layoff and steep -550 price.
Cody is wary of Arce's layoff, weight class move, and injuries, but still picks him because Burns is unreliable and quits when his early submission doesn't work. He thinks Arce's volume and durability will carry him, but the -400 price is unappealing.
Daniel Vreeland picks Julio Arce but calls it a dog-or-pass situation at -400. He acknowledges Arce's solid striking and takedown defense but notes Burns' elite jiu-jitsu and motivation. He thinks Burns could get an early submission if Arce makes a mistake, but Arce is the safer pick. He won't lay the price.
Arce is a talented Muay Thai striker with head kicks and combinations. Burns has a terrible gas tank and fades if he doesn't finish early. Arce should stay at distance, land pot shots, and work the body. Burns will present early danger but Arce will take over in the second and third rounds, finishing via TKO. Prediction: Arce round 3.
Paul agrees with Cody's assessment, noting Burns' history of quitting and Arce's potential advantages. He doesn't love the price but sees Arce as the likely winner.
The host picks Julio Arce to survive an early storm from Herbert Burns and then take over. He believes Burns will go for a takedown early, but Arce will work his way out. Once things don't go Burns' way, he expects Burns to break and fade. He predicts a late second-round TKO for Arce.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Algeo | 0 | 28 of 36 | 77% | 81 of 104 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 5:26 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 10 of 12 | 83% | 18 of 25 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 2 | 0 | 0:32 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bill Algeo | 0 | 24 of 30 | 80% | 65 of 84 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 4:01 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 10 of 12 | 83% | 18 of 25 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 2 | 0 | 0:32 | |
| 2 | Bill Algeo | 0 | 4 of 6 | 66% | 16 of 20 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 1:25 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 of 0 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0:00 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Algeo | 28 of 36 | 77% | 21 of 28 | 6 of 7 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 4 | 2 of 2 | 24 of 30 |
| Herbert Burns | 10 of 12 | 83% | 6 of 8 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 3 | 6 of 8 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bill Algeo | 24 of 30 | 80% | 19 of 25 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 2 | 21 of 26 |
| Herbert Burns | 10 of 12 | 83% | 6 of 8 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 3 | 6 of 8 | |
| 2 | Bill Algeo | 4 of 6 | 66% | 2 of 3 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 4 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
Angelo picks Bill Algeo confidently, citing Algeo's pressure, wrestling defense, and BJJ black belt to neutralize Burns' grappling. He notes Burns' two-year layoff and Algeo's impressive win over Joe Anderson Brito. He has a moneyline bet on Algeo at -160.
Big Brady picks Bill Algeo to win by decision. He notes that Algeo has poor takedown defense but an elite get-up game and a black belt in BJJ, making him hard to hold down. He thinks Burns's cardio will fade after the first round, allowing Algeo to take over on the feet. He mentions a late finish is possible if Burns gasses.
Cody picks Algeo but dislikes the -205 price. He argues that Burns has a terrible gas tank and will fade after the first round, while Algeo has high output and good submission defense. He expects Algeo to survive early takedowns and then overwhelm Burns in later rounds.
Daniel Levi does not make a clear pick, viewing it as a dog-or-pass situation. He notes Algeo's takedown defense issues and Burns's submission threat, but also Burns's cardio and weight cut concerns. He sees Algeo winning the later rounds if he survives, but the -200 price on Algeo is too high for his liking.
Paul also picks Algeo but is not confident, noting that Algeo's takedown defense is poor and Burns is physically strong. He believes Burns will take Algeo down early, but Algeo's BJJ black belt and cardio should allow him to survive and win later rounds. He suggests live betting Algeo after the first round.
The MMA Guru picks Bill Algeo over Herbert Burns, noting Burns' tendency to fade after the second round and Algeo's durability. He mentions Algeo's solid chin and ability to take big shots, as seen in fights against Joe Anderson Brito and Spike Carlyle. He predicts Algeo will survive early rounds and dominate later, winning by decision (29-28 or 29-27).
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 0 | 10 of 22 | 45% | 35 of 48 | 3 of 4 | 75% | 0 | 0 | 2:39 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 57 of 75 | 76% | 173 of 205 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 1 | 6:13 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 0 | 4 of 13 | 30% | 21 of 31 | 1 of 2 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0:12 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 24 of 40 | 60% | 87 of 111 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 4:18 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 0 | 6 of 9 | 66% | 14 of 17 | 2 of 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 2:27 |
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 33 of 35 | 94% | 86 of 94 | 0 of 1 | 0% | 0 | 1 | 1:55 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pineda | 10 of 22 | 45% | 6 of 15 | 2 of 5 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 15 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Herbert Burns | 57 of 75 | 76% | 50 of 65 | 4 of 7 | 3 of 3 | 8 of 13 | 1 of 1 | 48 of 61 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Pineda | 4 of 13 | 30% | 1 of 7 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 2 | 1 of 1 |
| Herbert Burns | 24 of 40 | 60% | 19 of 32 | 3 of 6 | 2 of 2 | 6 of 10 | 1 of 1 | 17 of 29 | |
| 2 | Daniel Pineda | 6 of 9 | 66% | 5 of 8 | 0 of 0 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 5 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 4 |
| Herbert Burns | 33 of 35 | 94% | 31 of 33 | 1 of 1 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 31 of 32 |
Big Brady is impressed with Herbert Burns' improvements and superior grappling. He expects Burns to submit Pineda in the first round, noting Pineda has been submitted five times. He thinks the fight won't go to decision.
Daniel Levi picks Herbert Burns to win by first-round submission. He notes that Pineda has never been to a decision (0-6 in decisions) and has been submitted six times. He believes Pineda's scrambling style is a bad matchup against Burns' elite jiu-jitsu. He also points out that Pineda's recent wins were overturned due to PEDs, and he may be deflated under USADA testing. He cites Burns' performance against Dunham as evidence of his submission prowess.
Pineda is a live dog with strong wrestling and top pressure; he has not been submitted since 2010 and has the experience to survive Burns' early submission threats. Burns' recent finishes are against over-the-hill competition, while Pineda is still in his prime. The line is too wide; Pineda should be closer to +120. He will play it safe, rack up rounds, and win a decision.
The MMA Guru picks Herbert Burns by submission in the first round, calling it the surest win on the card. He highlights Burns' knockout of Nate Landwehr with a knee up the middle as evidence of his finishing ability, and dismisses Pineda as a past-prime cheater.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Burns | 0 | 3 of 6 | 50% | 4 of 7 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:05 |
| Evan Dunham | 0 | 5 of 10 | 50% | 8 of 13 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 0:38 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Burns | 0 | 3 of 6 | 50% | 4 of 7 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:05 |
| Evan Dunham | 0 | 5 of 10 | 50% | 8 of 13 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 0:38 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Burns | 3 of 6 | 50% | 2 of 5 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | 2 of 4 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
| Evan Dunham | 5 of 10 | 50% | 4 of 6 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 4 of 8 | 0 of 1 | 1 of 1 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Burns | 3 of 6 | 50% | 2 of 5 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | 2 of 4 | 1 of 2 | 0 of 0 |
| Evan Dunham | 5 of 10 | 50% | 4 of 6 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 4 of 8 | 0 of 1 | 1 of 1 |
Big Brady picks Herbert Burns but is hesitant due to Evan Dunham's layoff and age. He notes Dunham has good striking and BJJ, but the two-year layoff and recent losses make it hard to pick him. He expects a close fight with Burns winning by decision, possibly hurting Dunham to the body.
Daniel believes Burns has caught up to where he can beat a veteran like Dunham. He highlights Burns' wrestling entries, ten-year black belt in jiu-jitsu, and developing power in his striking. He notes Dunham retired for a reason and has shown vulnerability to body shots. He predicts Burns will finish Dunham, possibly by submission or body shots.
Evan Dunham is a high-level jiu-jitsu player with great takedown defense and refined striking. He should be able to keep the fight on the feet and pick apart Herbert Burns, who is wild and chaotic. Dunham's hands have looked good, and he can put together combinations ending with kicks. Even if the fight goes to the ground, Dunham is safe due to his own jiu-jitsu. The only concern is the layoff, but at plus money he is a steal.
Totals
| Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Burns | 1 | 7 of 17 | 41% | 7 of 17 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 1:34 |
| Nate Landwehr | 0 | 4 of 9 | 44% | 6 of 11 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:33 |
Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | KD | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Total Str. | TD | TD % | Sub. Att | Rev. | Ctrl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Burns | 1 | 7 of 17 | 41% | 7 of 17 | 1 of 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 1:34 |
| Nate Landwehr | 0 | 4 of 9 | 44% | 6 of 11 | 0 of 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0:33 |
Significant Strikes
| Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Burns | 7 of 17 | 41% | 2 of 10 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 0 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 |
| Nate Landwehr | 4 of 9 | 44% | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
Significant Strikes Per Round
| Rd | Fighter | Sig. Str. | Sig. Str. % | Head | Body | Leg | Distance | Clinch | Ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Burns | 7 of 17 | 41% | 2 of 10 | 5 of 7 | 0 of 0 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 |
| Nate Landwehr | 4 of 9 | 44% | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 | 0 of 0 |
Daniel picks Herbert Burns to win by first-round submission, citing his significant advantage on the mat as a BJJ black belt. He notes that Landwehr has been taken down and dropped multiple times in his fights and may not survive Burns' submission attempts. He believes Burns will take him down and finish quickly.
The MMA Guru picks Herbert Burns based on his denser record of better names and wins, including a notable win over Timothy in ONE FC. He views Burns as a big featherweight to look out for in his debut, while noting Nate Landwehr's record lacks recognizable names.
Expert Picks (4)
Big Brady is impressed with Herbert Burns' improvements and superior grappling. He expects Burns to submit Pineda in the first round, noting Pineda has been submitted five times. He thinks the fight won't go to decision.
Daniel Levi picks Herbert Burns to win by first-round submission. He notes that Pineda has never been to a decision (0-6 in decisions) and has been submitted six times. He believes Pineda's scrambling style is a bad matchup against Burns' elite jiu-jitsu. He also points out that Pineda's recent wins were overturned due to PEDs, and he may be deflated under USADA testing. He cites Burns' performance against Dunham as evidence of his submission prowess.
Pineda is a live dog with strong wrestling and top pressure; he has not been submitted since 2010 and has the experience to survive Burns' early submission threats. Burns' recent finishes are against over-the-hill competition, while Pineda is still in his prime. The line is too wide; Pineda should be closer to +120. He will play it safe, rack up rounds, and win a decision.
The MMA Guru picks Herbert Burns by submission in the first round, calling it the surest win on the card. He highlights Burns' knockout of Nate Landwehr with a knee up the middle as evidence of his finishing ability, and dismisses Pineda as a past-prime cheater.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!